Intermittent fasting
Behavioral · Evidence and recent research
Notify me when meaningful evidence changes.
Where things stand
Intermittent fasting changes when people eat, and may also reduce how much they eat. Human research has examined weight and metabolic or ageing-related markers, but those outcomes should not be confused with demonstrated life extension. An important question is whether meal timing adds benefit beyond changes in total food intake, and whether an approach remains appropriate over time. Source ↗ Recently: No update dated within the past 30 days is recorded in our collection. This describes our coverage, not a conclusion that the wider research is unchanged.
AI-written overview · not expert-reviewed · Background sources checked Sep 23, 2026 · Recent updates cover the last 30 days of this collection. A new report does not automatically change the evidence assessment.
Background and coverage
NIA: calorie restriction and fasting ↗
- Regulatory status
- Not applicable
- Availability
- Widely available
- Category
- Behavioral
- Human results verified here
- 0
Evidence collection is needs review. 0 approved assessments; 19 assessments awaiting review; 0 published studies with verified results. Safety: not assessed.
Recorded evidence activity (experimental)
A numeric breakdown will be available after baseline review. Safety is not yet assessed.
What changed
Evidence events affecting this intervention
A Nutritional and Pharmacological Intervention for Body, Brain, and Longevity Effects (NIBBLE) - A Randomized Open-label Intervention of the Fasting-mimicking Diet (FMD) and Rapamycin (NIBBLE)
Trial registry update: NOT_YET_RECRUITING. No results reported in the supplied registry record.
Targeting Healthy Eating to Maintain Energy While Living With Cancer (THYME) (2668GCCC)
Trial registry update: NOT_YET_RECRUITING. No results reported in the supplied registry record.
Systematic review: mTOR pathway integrates aging hallmarks; causal lifespan effects shown in model organisms, human evidence associative.
This systematic review examined mTOR signaling as a hub coordinating aging processes across genetic, experimental, and translational studies. In model organisms, mTOR pathway inhibition shows causal effects on lifespan regulation, whereas human data remain predominantly observational and associative. The review identifies mTOR as an integrative node linking multiple aging hallmarks and notes that major geroprotective interventions—including autophagy activation, dietary changes, physical activity, and senotherapeutics—partly converge on but also diverge from mTOR pathway modulation.
Time-restricted eating showed no reported effects on cancer-related fatigue in a phase II RCT protocol.
This is a protocol paper describing a planned 12-week randomized controlled trial (THYME study) comparing time-restricted eating (10-hour daytime eating window) versus nutrition counseling in 132 adults aged 55+ with prostate or metastatic breast cancer. The study aims to assess effects on fatigue, frailty, and circadian rhythm markers, with planned follow-up at 12 weeks and 12 months. No results from the trial are reported in this abstract—only the study design and hypotheses are presented.
DiAL Health pilot RCT testing adaptive versus traditional caloric restriction and time-restricted eating in 90 young adults.
DiAL Health is a 24-week randomized controlled pilot trial enrolling 90 healthy adults aged 22–45 into five groups: nonintervention control, traditional or adaptive time-restricted eating (8-hour window), and traditional or adaptive caloric restriction (25% energy reduction). Adaptive interventions used mobile health technology with real-time monitoring and personalized feedback; traditional interventions used in-person counseling. Primary outcomes were feasibility measures (adherence, retention, satisfaction); secondary outcomes included biological age (Klemera-Doubal) and metabolic syndrome score. No efficacy results have been reported yet.
Assessment history
The 25 most recent recorded changes, including corrections and backfill
Human studies with verified results
No published human results verified in this collection yet
Animal and mechanistic evidence
No preclinical studies tracked yet
Clinical trials
Claims
Testable statements and where the evidence stands