canceldeath
Assessment superseded

Earlier menopause and higher parity associated with increased epigenetic age in meta-analysis of 29 studies

A meta-analysis of 29 studies (550,550 female participants) examined associations between reproductive history and DNA methylation clocks, which estimate epigenetic age acceleration. Earlier age at menopause was significantly associated with higher epigenetic age (β=−0.08 years per year earlier for GrimAge), and higher parity was associated with increased epigenetic age (β=0.13 years per delivery for PhenoAge). Age at menarche showed no consistent relationship with epigenetic age across clock types.

META ANALYSISN=550,550Notable significance
Reporter brief

What this changes

The finding has not established an approved change to our evidence assessment.

Source date: Sep 14, 2026 · Discovered: Sep 15, 2026 · Assessed: — · Research update

What it does not prove

  • Limitations have not yet been verified. Read the primary source.

Extracted from supplied source material; model confidence is not a measured probability of correctness.

Design
Meta analysis
Sample size
550,550
Duration
—
Population
29 studies of female participants (100% female) with median mean age 35.4 years (IQR: 30.3-62.7)
Primary outcome
Association between reproductive history and epigenetic age acceleration (EAA) measured by DNA methylation clocks
Effect size
For age at menopause and GrimAge: β=-0.08 years per one-year earlier menopause (95% CI: -0.11, -0.05, n=5920). For parity and PhenoAge: β=0.13 years per delivery (95% CI: 0.04, 0.21, n=4508)
Significance
Mixed
Journal
Mechanisms of ageing and development
Published
Sep 14, 2026

Conflicts: Mixed findings across studies for age at menarche, pregnancy complications, and adverse birth outcomes. No relationship found between age at menarche and EAA in any DNAm clocks

Assessment history

9/23/2026 · SUPERSEDED: Source updated; assessment withdrawn pending review.

One thread per scientific event, no matter how many outlets covered it.

Sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet

Be the first to weigh in on this evidence.