Registry update — unassessed
Nicotinamide Riboside to Improve Functioning in PAD
Trial registry update: NOT_YET_RECRUITING. No results reported in the supplied registry record.
RCTN=250Notable significance
What this changes
The finding has not established an approved change to our evidence assessment.
Source date: Aug 24, 2026 · Discovered: Sep 23, 2026 · Assessed: — · Historical research backfill
What it does not prove
- The abstract presents only the study protocol, not results; no efficacy or safety conclusions can be drawn.
- Without reported effect sizes or p-values, the magnitude or statistical significance of any treatment differences cannot be assessed.
- Secondary outcomes including muscle perfusion, oxidative stress, and NAD+ levels are not reported here.
Extracted from supplied source material; model confidence is not a measured probability of correctness.
Study details
- Design
- Rct
- Sample size
- 250
- Duration
- 7 months
- Population
- People with peripheral artery disease (PAD) age 50 and older
- Primary outcome
- Change in six-minute walk distance at six-month follow-up
- Effect size
- —
- Significance
- Not reported
- Journal
- Northwestern University
- Published
- Aug 24, 2026
Sources
Primary source
- Northwestern University ↗Clinical trial
Recorded source passages
Abstract or registry material supplied for assessment; source version 1. This is not a claim of full-text review.
Among people with peripheral artery disease (PAD) age 50 and older, the investigators will test the hypothesis that PAD participants randomized to nicotinamide riboside (NR) will have greater improvement or less decline in six-minute walk distance at six-month follow-up, compared to those randomized to placebo.
The study will randomize 250 participants with PAD age 50 and older to one of two groups for six months: nicotinamide riboside vs placebo.
Participants will be followed for six months, with an additional four-week follow-up period after completion of the study intervention.
Assessment history
Discussion (0)
One thread per scientific event, no matter how many outlets covered it.
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet
Be the first to weigh in on this evidence.