Registry update — unassessed
Codesign, Physical Activity and Seniors
Trial registry update: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING. No results reported in the supplied registry record.
RCTMinor significance
What this changes
The finding has not established an approved change to our evidence assessment.
Source date: Oct 13, 2026 · Discovered: Oct 13, 2026 · Assessed: — · Research update
What it does not prove
- The abstract does not report actual findings or whether co-designed programs improved adherence or long-term physical activity adoption compared to standard programs
- No comparator group or control condition is described, making it unclear what co-designed programs were compared against
- Results, sample characteristics, and duration of follow-up are not provided, preventing assessment of the intervention's actual effectiveness
Extracted from supplied source material; model confidence is not a measured probability of correctness.
Study details
- Design
- Rct
- Sample size
- —
- Duration
- —
- Population
- Seniors
- Primary outcome
- Program adherence and long-term physical activity adoption
- Effect size
- —
- Significance
- Not reported
- Journal
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
- Published
- Oct 13, 2026
Sources
Primary source
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice ↗Clinical trial
Recorded source passages
Abstract or registry material supplied for assessment; source version 1. This is not a claim of full-text review.
The objective of this study is to determine the effects of co-created physical activity programs with participants on program adherence and long-term physical activity adoption.
The hypothesis is that co-created physical activity would lead to better adherence and long-term commitment.
Assessment history
Discussion (0)
One thread per scientific event, no matter how many outlets covered it.
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet
Be the first to weigh in on this evidence.