canceldeath
Sign in
Resistance training
Assessment superseded

LOW LOAD BLOOD FLOW RESTRICTION RESISTANCE TRAINING IN COLORECTAL CANCER RELATED SARCOPENIA

Trial registry update: RECRUITING. No results reported in the supplied registry record.

RCTMinor significance
Share on X
Reporter brief

What this changes

The finding has not established an approved change to our evidence assessment.

Source date: Oct 14, 2026 · Discovered: Oct 14, 2026 · Assessed: — · Research update

What it does not prove

  • No findings are reported—only the study design and research question are stated, so no effects can be assessed
  • The actual sample size is unknown; the abstract does not report enrollment, completion rates, or baseline characteristics
  • Whether this training approach was compared to a control group or standard care is not specified in the material provided

Extracted from supplied source material; model confidence is not a measured probability of correctness.

Study details

Design
Rct
Sample size
—
Duration
—
Population
Colorectal cancer survivors with probable sarcopenia
Primary outcome
Muscle strength
Effect size
—
Significance
Not reported
Journal
Ahmed Adel Ahmed Elsayed Ali Radwan
Published
Oct 21, 2026

Sources

Primary source

Recorded source passages

Abstract or registry material supplied for assessment; source version 1. This is not a claim of full-text review.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of low-load resistance training combined with blood flow restriction on muscle strength, functional performance, and cancer-related fatigue in colorectal cancer survivors with probable sarcopenia.
Muscle weakness and cancer-related fatigue are prevalent in colorectal cancer survivors with probable sarcopenia and are associated with adverse outcomes
It is hypothesized that low-load blood flow restriction resistance training will lead to significant improvements in muscle strength and functional performance, and a significant reduction in cancer-related fatigue in colorectal cancer survivors with probable sarcopenia.

Source versions

Version 2: Unassessed

Version 1: Superseded

Assessment history

10/21/2026 · SUPERSEDED: Source updated; assessment withdrawn pending review.

Discussion (0)

One thread per scientific event, no matter how many outlets covered it.

Sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet

Be the first to weigh in on this evidence.