Registry update — unassessed
Multi-Center, Randomized, Single Masked Phase 2 Study of Intravitreal Injections of Sirolimus in the Treatment of Geographic Atrophy Associated With Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Trial registry update: TERMINATED. No results reported in the supplied registry record.
RCTN=50Notable significance
What this changes
The finding has not established an approved change to our evidence assessment.
Source date: Dec 10, 2015 · Discovered: Sep 19, 2026 · Assessed: — · Historical research backfill
What it does not prove
- The study provides no evidence of efficacy, as it was halted before completion and no outcome data comparing sirolimus to sham are reported.
- Safety concerns led to early termination, but the specific adverse events are not detailed in this document.
- The early stopping means any potential benefit or harm from longer-term treatment remains unknown.
Extracted from supplied source material; model confidence is not a measured probability of correctness.
Study details
- Design
- Rct
- Sample size
- 50
- Duration
- 24 months
- Population
- 50 persons with central or non-central geographic atrophy (GA) associated with age-related macular degeneration (AMD); GA in treated eye between 0.75 and 8 disk areas (DA)
- Primary outcome
- Slower worsening of geographic atrophy in sirolimus-treated participants compared to sham-treated participants
- Effect size
- —
- Significance
- Not reported
- Journal
- National Eye Institute (NEI)</journal> </invoke>
- Published
- Dec 10, 2015
Sources
Primary source
- National Eye Institute (NEI) ↗Clinical trial
Recorded source passages
Abstract or registry material supplied for assessment; source version 1. This is not a claim of full-text review.
This study will seek to enroll 50 persons who have central or non-central geographic atrophy (GA) associated with age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
Eligible participants will be randomly chosen to receive one of the following treatments in the study eye: 1. A 20 μL (440 μg) intravitreal (IVT) injection of sirolimus, or 2. A sham treatment (subconjunctival injection of lidocaine)
The primary goal is to evaluate whether the persons receiving the sirolimus injections show a slower worsening of geographic atrophy compared to the persons receiving the sham injections. A secondary goal is to evaluate the impact of sirolimus on vision compared to the sham.
As of May 30, 2014, study injections were discontinued due to safety concerns. No further enrollments will occur and follow-up will continue on all active study participants on a quarterly basis.
Source versions
Assessment history
Discussion (0)
One thread per scientific event, no matter how many outlets covered it.
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet
Be the first to weigh in on this evidence.