Registry update — unassessed
Research on Lower Limb Rehabilitation Robots for Sarcopenia
Trial registry update: RECRUITING. No results reported in the supplied registry record.
RCTMinor significance
What this changes
The finding has not established an approved change to our evidence assessment.
Source date: Sep 21, 2026 · Discovered: Sep 21, 2026 · Assessed: — · Research update
What it does not prove
- Whether the intervention actually improved any measured outcomes—no results are reported in the provided material
- Whether robot-assisted training provided additional benefit over usual care alone—the comparison was planned but results are not stated
- Whether outcomes persisted beyond the 8-week intervention period or any longer-term effects
Extracted from supplied source material; model confidence is not a measured probability of correctness.
Study details
- Design
- Rct
- Sample size
- —
- Duration
- 2 months
- Population
- adults aged 60 years or older with sarcopenia
- Primary outcome
- muscle mass and body composition
- Effect size
- —
- Significance
- Not reported
- Journal
- Taipei Medical University Hospital
- Published
- Sep 21, 2026
Sources
Primary source
- Taipei Medical University Hospital ↗Clinical trial
Recorded source passages
Abstract or registry material supplied for assessment; source version 2. This is not a claim of full-text review.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether lower-limb rehabilitation robot training combined with nutrition education can improve muscle mass and physical function in adults aged 60 years or older with sarcopenia.
Researchers will compare participants who receive lower-limb rehabilitation robot training plus nutrition education with participants who receive usual care, including exercise and nutrition education.
Participants will: 1. Complete assessments before the intervention, around week 5, and after week 8. 2. Receive either 8 weeks of lower-limb rehabilitation robot training using the MRG-P110 plus nutrition education, or usual care including exercise and nutrition education.
Source versions
Assessment history
Discussion (0)
One thread per scientific event, no matter how many outlets covered it.
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet
Be the first to weigh in on this evidence.