Registry update — unassessed
Resistance Training and Rapamycin to Enhance Bone Formation in Postmenopausal Women
Trial registry update: RECRUITING. No results reported in the supplied registry record.
RCTRoutine significance
What this changes
The finding has not established an approved change to our evidence assessment.
Source date: Apr 6, 2026 · Discovered: Sep 19, 2026 · Assessed: — · Historical research backfill
What it does not prove
- This is a protocol description with no outcome data reported, so no claims about efficacy or safety can be made
- The comparison includes an active intervention (resistance training) combined with drug and placebo, which limits interpretation of which component drives any observed effect
- Sample size was not reported, preventing assessment of statistical power or whether enrollment was completed
Extracted from supplied source material; model confidence is not a measured probability of correctness.
Study details
- Design
- Rct
- Sample size
- —
- Duration
- —
- Population
- Postmenopausal women aged 60-75 years
- Primary outcome
- Bone formation and muscle function in elderly postmenopausal women
- Effect size
- —
- Significance
- Not reported
- Journal
- Odense University Hospital
- Published
- Apr 6, 2026
Sources
Primary source
- Odense University Hospital ↗Clinical trial
Recorded source passages
Abstract or registry material supplied for assessment; source version 1. This is not a claim of full-text review.
Participants will be randomized 1:1:1:1 to one of the following treatment regimens: Oral everolimus 5 mg once a week. Oral placebo once a week. Oral everolimus 5 mg once a week plus resistance training RT 1 hour, 3 times weekly. Oral placebo once a week plus resistance training RT 1 hour, 3 times weekly.
The aim of the present clinical trial is to examine the effects of everolimus, resistance training, or their combination on bone and muscle health formation in elderly women aged 60-75 years.
Source versions
Assessment history
Discussion (0)
One thread per scientific event, no matter how many outlets covered it.
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet
Be the first to weigh in on this evidence.