Registry update — unassessed
"Women in Action": A Multicomponent Gender-Sensitive Intervention Combining Nutrition, Psychosocial Factors, and Strength Training in Perimenopausal, Menopausal, and Early-Aging Women-A Quasi-Experimental Study Protocol
Trial registry update: NOT_YET_RECRUITING. No results reported in the supplied registry record.
OTHERMinor significance
What this changes
The finding has not established an approved change to our evidence assessment.
Source date: Oct 6, 2026 · Discovered: Oct 6, 2026 · Assessed: — · Research update
What it does not prove
- This is a protocol describing planned research, not a completed study with actual results; no outcome data are available
- Quasi-experimental design without randomization cannot establish causation; observed effects may reflect selection bias or differences between groups
- Comparison with passive control (no intervention) cannot determine which components of the multicomponent intervention drive any effects
Extracted from supplied source material; model confidence is not a measured probability of correctness.
Study details
- Design
- Other
- Sample size
- —
- Duration
- 4 months
- Population
- Women aged 55-75 in perimenopause, menopause, and early aging
- Primary outcome
- Handgrip strength
- Effect size
- —
- Significance
- Not reported
- Journal
- Universidad de Oviedo
- Published
- Oct 6, 2026
Sources
Primary source
- Universidad de Oviedo ↗Clinical trial
Recorded source passages
Abstract or registry material supplied for assessment; source version 1. This is not a claim of full-text review.
"Women in Action" is a quasi-experimental, mixed-methods study evaluating a 16-week multicomponent intervention (supervised strength/aerobic/balance training plus psychoeducational and nutrition-focused behavioral workshops) for women aged 55-75 in perimenopause, menopause, and early ageing.
The study will assess the feasibility, implementation fidelity, and acceptability of the program, together with its preliminary effects on a single primary outcome (handgrip strength) and secondary physical function, dietary, and psychosocial outcomes, compared with a passive control group receiving no intervention.
Assessment history
Discussion (0)
One thread per scientific event, no matter how many outlets covered it.
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet
Be the first to weigh in on this evidence.