canceldeath
Assessment superseded

Exercise increases circulating Klotho across populations; meta-analysis of 14 randomized trials

A meta-analysis of 14 randomized controlled trials (n=893, ages 30-94) examined the effect of exercise training on circulating α-Klotho. Chronic training (≥12 weeks) produced a pooled effect of Hedges' g=1.20 (95% CI 0.85-1.55). In chronic kidney disease patients specifically, exercise increased Klotho by 158.82 pg/mL and reduced FGF23 by 102.07 pg/mL. Resistance training and high-intensity interval training showed the most robust effects.

META ANALYSISN=893Notable significance
Reporter brief

What this changes

The finding has not established an approved change to our evidence assessment.

Source date: Sep 3, 2026 · Discovered: Sep 18, 2026 · Assessed: — · Research update

What it does not prove

  • Limitations have not yet been verified. Read the primary source.

Extracted from supplied source material; model confidence is not a measured probability of correctness.

Design
Meta analysis
Sample size
893
Duration
—
Population
14 RCTs with total n=893; age range 30-94 years. Emphasis on older adults (≥60 years), patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes, and sarcopenia. Pre-frail older adults subgroup: n=69, mean age 77 years
Primary outcome
Circulating α-Klotho (soluble serum or plasma) measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Effect size
Pooled effect of chronic training (≥12 weeks) on s-Klotho: Hedges' g = 1.20 (95% CI 0.85-1.55). In CKD patients: MD = 158.82 pg/mL (95% CI 122.33-194.31) for Klotho; MD = -102.07 pg/mL (95% CI -176.23 to -27.91) for FGF23. In pre-frail older adults (n=69, mean age 77 years), 12-week classical resistance training significantly increased s-Klotho
Significance
Significant
Journal
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living</journal> <parameter name="fundingSummary">Not reported
Published
Sep 3, 2026

Funding: Not reported in abstract.

Conflicts: Not reported

Assessment history

9/23/2026 · SUPERSEDED: Source updated; assessment withdrawn pending review.

One thread per scientific event, no matter how many outlets covered it.

Sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet

Be the first to weigh in on this evidence.